Help support by visiting our sponsors.

Author Topic: 12 ga. broadheads?  (Read 1777 times)


  • Contributor
  • ****
  • Posts: 1053
    • My gaming clan

  • Offline
12 ga. broadheads?
« on: July 21, 2015, 09:31:04 pm »
Something else I wouldn't want to be shot with.

Missouri"You can only fight the way you practice"  - Miyamoto Musashi

Diapers and politicians should be changed often. For the very same reasons.

  • Advertisement
  • ***


    • Co-Founder
    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 22121
    • The Ogre

    • Offline
    Re: 12 ga. broadheads?
    « Reply #1 on: July 21, 2015, 09:52:29 pm »
    And... how is this supposed to be better than a normal Slug?  Fosters, Brenneke, or Sabot?  Accuracy looks highly inconsistent and I'm really not getting the application for these that would give more desirable results over existing options.   
    The Penetration potential is interesting, yes.  But Federal already has penetrating slugs that I would bet would deliver better results. 
    And if you need more penetration that that, Son, a Shotgun isn't the weapon of choice.
    « Last Edit: July 21, 2015, 11:38:47 pm by GeorgeHill »
    South CarolinaCo-Founder of
    The Ogre from

    Vires et Honestas
    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.


    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 10233
    • eccentric orbit

    • Offline
    Re: 12 ga. broadheads?
    « Reply #2 on: July 21, 2015, 11:31:48 pm »
    ^ This.   The design looks like it is not easily stabilized in flight so I'd have a hard time imagining any state game and fish dept. approving them for use on big game.   Vermin and predator control are easily handled by standard ammunition.   Like the man said, "Just because you CAN do something doesn't necessarily mean you SHOULD do it." . 
    Arizona" A republic, if you can keep it."

                                                   Benjamin Franklin

    Help support by visiting our sponsors.