Help support WeTheArmed.com by visiting our sponsors.

Author Topic: Under rated?  (Read 14023 times)

ZeroTA

  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 2969
  • Minister of Random Punishments

  • Offline
Re: Under rated?
« Reply #25 on: October 24, 2008, 09:06:12 pm »
I completely agree. .308,like Preparation H,is better on the whole. *Bonus points for Austin Powers reference* Can't argue with facts,can I?

I can't find the link I referred to. I know I linked to it from THR though. I really want to find that now. It may have been on AmmoOracle,which I can't get to open.
I'm not saying you should use an M1A for home defense, but I'm also not saying you shouldn't.

WeTheArmed.com

  • Advertisement
  • ***

    Red Tornado

    • Junior Member
    • *
    • Posts: 6

    • Offline
    Re: Under rated?
    « Reply #26 on: October 29, 2008, 03:13:53 pm »
    I had a Savage model 12, pre-accutrigger, pre BVSS, etc., and it was ridicously accurate.  I think it's a great platform for what it is...a great, great varmint rifle.  Super accurate, chambered for varmint calibers...that's what it needs to be.  It's not trying to be a sniper in .308, that's the Model 10, I think.
    RT

    GeorgeHill

    • Co-Founder
    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 22154
    • The Ogre
      • MadOgre.com

    • Offline
    Re: Under rated?
    « Reply #27 on: October 30, 2008, 12:28:37 pm »
    Lots of love here for the .308.  Just remember that .308 completely defines "Average" in terms of ballistics.  There are a few reasons it's popular... it is remarkably efficient, it's accurate, and thanks to the plethora of arms out there for it there is a massive legacy of hardware and components and that helps keep the costs of it down.  And that's great.  But it only scores a "C" grade. 
    It was said that you can use it on big game... yeah... you CAN... but that doesn't mean you should.  Big Game is a broad catagory and there are a lot of critters out there that .308 is probably the minimum you should go after them with.  While there is nothing wrong with it, I just don't consider the .308 to be a big game cartrige.   I'm quite fond of my .308 rifle, but if I'm going after something bigger than an Antelope and I want to hit it out to 400 yards or past - i'm not grabbing it.
    For serious killing, I always reach for my 7mm Rem Mag.
    South CarolinaCo-Founder of WeTheArmed.com
    The Ogre from MadOgre.com.

    Vires et Honestas
    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
    http://www.madogre.com/

    Klassh

    • Member
    • **
    • Posts: 149
    • Pew Pew!
      • Working Class Reader

    • Offline
    Re: Under rated?
    « Reply #28 on: October 30, 2008, 05:14:23 pm »
    Okay, BUT.

    Shooting a large animal past 400 yards, isn't what I would call as hunting.  Actually, I'd sort of call it unethical to a degree.

    I've always been of the thought that if you are hunting, you should give the game a fair chance.  You should try to get as close as possible before taking it down.  You can always get closer than 400 yards to a white tail, elk, moose, grizzly, whatever. You should easily be able to get within a 100 yards.

    So I disagree.  Within a couple hundred yards the .308 will work just dandy with good shot placement.

    I'm not knocking your ability to shoot past 400 yards and taking out a large animal, that's a commendable feat.  But I don't think there is no need for a shot like that with the exception of human targets.
    ~Klassh.
    My Blog - WorkingClassReader.com
    For those in the trenches of responsibility.

    New Blog Up! 10/16
    "On Friday - I killed my coworker."

    GeorgeHill

    • Co-Founder
    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 22154
    • The Ogre
      • MadOgre.com

    • Offline
    Re: Under rated?
    « Reply #29 on: October 30, 2008, 11:18:09 pm »
    Quote
    Actually, I'd sort of call it unethical to a degree.
    Feh... only if you are not confident in your ability.  You have to know your limit and you have to know your cartridge.
    You should come out here and talk about hunting the book cliffs and spout off about 400 being unethical.   You might end up on a milk carton.    We often hunt long range out here, because that's what's required. 
    Now, I'm all for ethical hunting.  Absolutely.  But throwing out arbitrary range limitations based on a narrow perspective is...  I can't find a word for it other than ignorant.





    Welcome to hunting in The West.
    South CarolinaCo-Founder of WeTheArmed.com
    The Ogre from MadOgre.com.

    Vires et Honestas
    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
    http://www.madogre.com/

    Ske1etor

    • Junior Member
    • *
    • Posts: 53
    • BOOM.... legshot.

    • Offline
    Re: Under rated?
    « Reply #30 on: October 31, 2008, 08:35:33 am »
    I normally consider the Weatherby Vanguard the most underrated hunting rifle on the market. 

    If you haven't shot one lately, I suggest you give it a shot (Pun completely intended).  For just a pinch over $400.00 you can get one NIB in any caliber. 

    I like the .308 for big game (Here in Louisiana, the biggest game is Black Bear and Whitetail.  The .308 Win is PLENTY for those animals).
    Save a tree, wipe your butt with an owl.

    GeorgeHill

    • Co-Founder
    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 22154
    • The Ogre
      • MadOgre.com

    • Offline
    Re: Under rated?
    « Reply #31 on: October 31, 2008, 03:32:09 pm »
    I normally consider the Weatherby Vanguard the most underrated hunting rifle on the market. 

    $399 Gets you a very solid gun in those Vanguards.  Best Bang for your Buck on the market.  Wide caliber options, great accuracy... hard to beat it.   It really is.   In .257 Weatherby Magnum... it's an amazingly capable rifle.  Top that with a Nikon Monarch and you have a fantastic weapon.
    I say that even though I am not really fond of the rifle... but you gotta respect it.
    South CarolinaCo-Founder of WeTheArmed.com
    The Ogre from MadOgre.com.

    Vires et Honestas
    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
    http://www.madogre.com/

    StevenTing

    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 4651

    • Offline
    Re: Under rated?
    « Reply #32 on: October 31, 2008, 03:40:05 pm »
    This is starting to sound like a pissing contest.  What's the point here again?  My attention span is very short.
    Utah

    Klassh

    • Member
    • **
    • Posts: 149
    • Pew Pew!
      • Working Class Reader

    • Offline
    Re: Under rated?
    « Reply #33 on: October 31, 2008, 06:29:49 pm »
    Considering that numerous people have been able to take any North American game with bows, I don't consider a 1100 yard shot to be ethical.

    While that is mighty fine shooting and commendable, the chance of wounding the animal by miscalculation is to great.  Along with having almost zero chance of a follow up shot to put the animal out if need be.

    To me, it isn't just the taking of animal's life that is part of the thrill of hunting.  It's the work involved.  The stalking, the preparation of getting your camo, decoys, calls, blind set up to either lure the animal in close or to sneak within it's sensory range is what makes the drama of a hunt so great.

    Having taken a white-tail at 15 yards using a .45 caliber air-rifle(800fps!) with a headshot, I can attest to giving the animal a decent shot at escape.

    Shooting critters out past a couple hundred yards, to me, isn't sporting.

    You -can- get closer.
    ~Klassh.
    My Blog - WorkingClassReader.com
    For those in the trenches of responsibility.

    New Blog Up! 10/16
    "On Friday - I killed my coworker."

    GeorgeHill

    • Co-Founder
    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 22154
    • The Ogre
      • MadOgre.com

    • Offline
    Re: Under rated?
    « Reply #34 on: October 31, 2008, 07:07:58 pm »
    It's nice to know when you have the ability to not have to.  Like I said before... it's about knowing your abilities and limitations and the limitations of your weapon.  That is what makes a hunter ethical or not.   Not some arbitrary range limitation.
    Know Your Ability.
    South CarolinaCo-Founder of WeTheArmed.com
    The Ogre from MadOgre.com.

    Vires et Honestas
    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
    http://www.madogre.com/

    Help support WeTheArmed.com by visiting our sponsors.