Author Topic: More random internet weirdness. (Read 1374663 times)

Chrissmitty820 · « **Reply #1525 on:** February 28, 2012, 02:36:13 pm »

Quote from: booksmart on February 28, 2012, 02:21:32 pm

I beg to differ, but think we should see a comparison to judge... maybe a whole line of 'em at once...

Seconded.

And I volunteer to judge

WeTheArmed.com

sohmdaddy · « **Reply #1526 on:** February 28, 2012, 02:44:10 pm »

I guess what I'm trying to say is that much mass flying around just isn't sustainable. Maybe we can get someone to lobby for tightening high capacity brassieres.

Thernlund · « **Reply #1527 on:** February 28, 2012, 02:50:49 pm »

I knew girls like that in high school. Mid-line attractive, but didn't really stand out, and didn't go out of their way to make themselves up, if they did at all. Did well in school, but weren't academic over-achievers.

They were the easiest girls in school; the ones that would put out for practically ANYONE, but hung out with the guys in the drama club that were as afraid of them as they were easy. They were often the girls who were thinking that guys in general could pretty easily have any girl they wanted, while the guys they hung around were thinking the same thing about them. And none of them ever did anything to test it.

Then they got to their mid-20s and finally figured out their super power.

-T.

coyotesfan97 · « **Reply #1528 on:** February 28, 2012, 03:11:15 pm »

Thernlund · « **Reply #1529 on:** February 28, 2012, 03:35:56 pm »

^^^ I was practically in tears through that whole thing.

-T.

HMPlatinum · « **Reply #1530 on:** February 28, 2012, 05:22:54 pm »

Quote from: Chrissmitty820 on February 28, 2012, 02:36:13 pm

Seconded.

And I volunteer to judge

I used to work in a strip club.
Seen all shapes, sizes, angles, and a few more adjectives and geometrical expressions.
Too big = pain, even for just a dance or two. Maybe not right then, but later...

Never understood why the girls wanted "more" to bounce around. Well, other than the obvious reason, but was it worth it?

HMPlatinum · « **Reply #1531 on:** February 28, 2012, 05:27:08 pm »

Quote from: coyotesfan97 on February 28, 2012, 03:11:15 pm

[Top 100 First World Problems]

I don't think Justin Bieber was on that list enough.

Not hatin'
Just sayin'

Chrissmitty820 · « **Reply #1532 on:** February 28, 2012, 05:38:25 pm »

Quote from: HMPlatinum on February 28, 2012, 05:22:54 pm

I used to work in a strip club.
Seen all shapes, sizes, angles, and a few more adjectives and geometrical expressions.
Too big = pain, even for just a dance or two. Maybe not right then, but later...

Never understood why the girls wanted "more" to bounce around. Well, other than the obvious reason, but was it worth it?

More bounce=more $$$. Girls bringing home $500+ per night might not mind the issues later

Khorne · « **Reply #1533 on:** February 28, 2012, 05:54:57 pm »

Outbreak · « **Reply #1534 on:** February 28, 2012, 06:20:37 pm »

Quote from: Chrissmitty820 on February 28, 2012, 05:38:25 pm

More bounce=more $$$. Girls bringing home $500+ per night might not mind the issues later

Depends on what degree those dollar scholarships paid for....

Chrissmitty820 · « **Reply #1535 on:** February 28, 2012, 06:29:35 pm »

Quote from: Outbreak on February 28, 2012, 06:20:37 pm

Depends on what degree those dollar scholarships paid for....

I forgot, they're working their way through school.

Those Med and Law school bills get expensive!

HMPlatinum · « **Reply #1536 on:** February 28, 2012, 07:40:56 pm »

Quote from: Chrissmitty820 on February 28, 2012, 06:29:35 pm

I forgot, they're working their way through school.

I met a grand total of ONE who did that, and almost all of them said it.

How did I know for sure? I had to get her for her set (more than once) and she was buried in books with headphones on.

sohmdaddy · « **Reply #1537 on:** February 28, 2012, 08:38:21 pm »

It may be $500 for one night, but it's a lifetime effect that only an expensive surgery could fix. Anyway, I think we all agree that women are attractive? (mostly)

akodo · « **Reply #1538 on:** February 28, 2012, 08:52:25 pm »

Gunnguy · « **Reply #1539 on:** February 28, 2012, 09:23:58 pm »

Quote from: akodo on February 28, 2012, 08:52:25 pm

TommyGunn · « **Reply #1540 on:** February 29, 2012, 12:24:41 am »

What..........................the..................................h*** .........................................was..........THAT?? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Outbreak · « **Reply #1541 on:** February 29, 2012, 12:36:42 am »

That was the Shatner, and you had better check yourself. One does not S___ with the Shat.

ETA: I'm partial to his interpretation of "Rocketman."

ksuguy · « **Reply #1542 on:** February 29, 2012, 12:40:22 am »

His renditions of Mr. Tambourine Man and Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds are also great.

Outbreak · « **Reply #1543 on:** February 29, 2012, 12:51:08 am »

Quote from: ksuguy on February 29, 2012, 12:40:22 am

His renditions of Mr. Tambourine Man and Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds are also great.

Searching now.

Enough Shatner songs in the thread for now. Let's get some different weirdness.

JesseL · « **Reply #1544 on:** February 29, 2012, 11:43:14 am »

It's really a shame that Leonard Nimoy's singing career was so overshadowed by the Shat.

Doug Wojtowicz · « **Reply #1545 on:** February 29, 2012, 12:41:27 pm »

Nimoy was a playah!

HMPlatinum · « **Reply #1546 on:** February 29, 2012, 05:19:44 pm »

JesseL, that's the 1st thing I thought of...

...

but I couldn't post it.

Thanks? I think...

Gunnguy · « **Reply #1547 on:** February 29, 2012, 10:25:01 pm »

Chrissmitty820 · « **Reply #1548 on:** February 29, 2012, 11:46:26 pm »

From- http://www.cracked.com/forums/topic/54942/david-wongs-image-macro-thread/0

GeorgeHill · « **Reply #1549 on:** March 01, 2012, 12:54:14 pm »

Leider Geil