Help support WeTheArmed.com by visiting our sponsors.

Author Topic: .357 Magnums from a short tube?  (Read 6661 times)

GeorgeHill

  • Co-Founder
  • WTA Staff
  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 22154
  • The Ogre
    • MadOgre.com

  • Offline
.357 Magnums from a short tube?
« on: November 16, 2016, 07:32:18 pm »
Generally speaking, I prefer Heavy For Caliber loads in ALL my guns.  I went through a Light Weight, High Velocity phase... but came back around to All Heavy, All the Time.   
Now, my favorite Carry Gun has become the 3" Ruger SP101, in .357 Magnum.  My load of choice has been the 158 grain SJHP .357 Magnum.  And I've pretty much loaded and carried nothing but this load.  It shoots very well, while being rather stout, but not too much for me... I like it. 
But I'm getting ready to fire up all this ammo as it's time to freshen the stash with some new ammo.
So...
Sell me on a different load.  Make your suggestions and give your opinions... But back it up with rational reason.   
South CarolinaCo-Founder of WeTheArmed.com
The Ogre from MadOgre.com.

Vires et Honestas
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
http://www.madogre.com/

WeTheArmed.com

  • Advertisement
  • ***

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #1 on: November 16, 2016, 08:03:41 pm »
     :shrug

    It's really up to you. From what I've researched, the 125 grain .357 magnums do well, even out of a short barrel.

    My sig line kind of says it all.

    And while I know you're not asking about them, certain .38 special loads have done very well as well  :cool.
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    GaBoy45

    • WTA LEO
    • Contributor
    • ****
    • Posts: 1420

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #2 on: November 16, 2016, 09:15:40 pm »
    I like the Buffalo Bore Short Barrel loads utilizing the Barnes 140 grain bullet. The Barnes bullets construction means that they often expand at slower velocities than a traditional JHP or even some of the bonded stuff. I've shot it through everything from a scandium J-Frame to my 627 8 shot with plenty of K Frames in between. It doesn't produce a huge fireball and is very controllable even from the J-Frames. It's not something I like to should very much of through the 340 but it's no where near as bad as the old 125 grain Federal or Winchester loads.

    The only other two loads I use in .357 are the Speer Short Barrel load and the old 125 grain Golden Saber. The Golden Saber is pretty easy to come by and the ballistics are pretty good. I'd call it a .357 Medium but still effective.

    Now the Speer load is a Magnum in name only. It's ballistics are the same as the +P 38 load.  I actually spoke to someone at Speer who explained that the bullet they developed did best at around 1000fps. Any more and it over expanded and penetrated too much. They said anything with a barrel over 4" creates too much velocity. It is basically for those who want the magnum name or don't like dealing with the build up in the cylinder from shooting .38s.

    But long story short, you'll like the Buffalo Bore Barnes load in 140 grain.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    “It takes very little to govern good people. Very little. And bad people cant be governed at all. Or if they could I never heard of it.”
    ― Cormac McCarthy, No Country for Old Men

    Desert Rat

    • Contributor
    • ****
    • Posts: 1310

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #3 on: November 16, 2016, 10:06:52 pm »
    When I had my Sp-101 (2 1/4" bbl) I loaded it with Federal 125 grain JHP's, mostly because they were hot, very controllable, and faster to shoot than the heavier loads, especially when shooting one-handed. That has always been an important issue to me. I would still go with those loads if I had a .357 snubby, although those Buffalo Bore shorty rounds are tempting.


    GeorgeHill

    • Co-Founder
    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 22154
    • The Ogre
      • MadOgre.com

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #4 on: November 16, 2016, 10:31:40 pm »
    :shrug

    It's really up to you.
    Cop Out Response is Cop Out.   ;)
    South CarolinaCo-Founder of WeTheArmed.com
    The Ogre from MadOgre.com.

    Vires et Honestas
    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
    http://www.madogre.com/

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #5 on: November 16, 2016, 10:33:22 pm »
    Cop Out Response is Cop Out.   ;)

     :rotfl

    Hey now! I wrote some other stuff beneath that! :hide
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    Thernlund

    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 14101

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #6 on: November 16, 2016, 10:36:31 pm »
    Cop Out Response is Cop Out.   ;)

    In his defense, it sounds like you have a freezer full of steak and are asking us to sell you on the merits of replacing it with hot dogs.   :eh


    -T.
    Arizona  Arm yourself because no one else here will save you.  The odds will betray you, and I will replace you...

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #7 on: November 16, 2016, 10:45:10 pm »
    In his defense, it sounds like you have a freezer full of steak and are asking us to sell you on the merits of replacing it with hot dogs.   :eh


    -T.

    :hat
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    coelacanth

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 10576
    • eccentric orbit

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #8 on: November 16, 2016, 11:57:18 pm »
    Yup.  You've found that you like the bread and butter load for the .357 mag.  Pretty much the prototype load for everything the .357 is good at and now you want us to talk you out of it?    :scrutiny    For factory ammo I've had good luck with Winchester's 140 grain Silvertip hollowpoints out of a three inch model 13 but the muzzle flash is significant.  If you're rolling your own I think the best advice is "If it ain't broke - don't fix it.".
    Arizona" A republic, if you can keep it."

                                                   Benjamin Franklin

    Grant

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8004

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #9 on: November 17, 2016, 07:35:51 am »
      I use PPU 158 SJHP for my snubnose, still chronographs 1160-1180FPS out of my 2.75" barrel....I think that's pretty snotty.  Cheap and expands really well, without the crack of the 125's I used to carry.

    Montana"I’d say the worst part of all this is the feeling of betrayal,           but I’m betting the part where they break in here and beat us to death might be worse.”

    Robinson

    • Senior Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 508

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #10 on: November 17, 2016, 04:01:31 pm »
    George- I confess I'm a bit surprised at your choice considering your hearing condition.  I transitioned away from revolvers and .45ACP 1911s because I have tinnitus and they were unpleasant to practice with.  Now I shoot and carry 9mm 1911s with 147gr subsonic ammunition.  Much easier on the ears at the range.

    Note:  I'm not trying to tell you what to do or not do -- just wondering about your choice is all.
    Georgia

    GeorgeHill

    • Co-Founder
    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 22154
    • The Ogre
      • MadOgre.com

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #11 on: November 17, 2016, 09:14:09 pm »
    All guns used in self defense will cause harm/damage/ruin hearing regardless.  I'd rather come out the other side of a bad encounter still living.  I can buy hearing aides... I can't buy another life.
    South CarolinaCo-Founder of WeTheArmed.com
    The Ogre from MadOgre.com.

    Vires et Honestas
    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
    http://www.madogre.com/

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #12 on: November 17, 2016, 09:19:49 pm »
    All guns used in self defense will cause harm/damage/ruin hearing regardless.  I'd rather come out the other side of a bad encounter still living.  I can buy hearing aides... I can't buy another life.

    In other words, when it comes to the anaemic handgun cartridge, the Ogre trusts his life to .357 magnum  >:D.
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    THE NORSEMAN

    • To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them. - Richard Henry Lee
    • Staff Member Emeritus
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 5071

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #13 on: November 17, 2016, 10:24:25 pm »
    SP101, 357 mag., 3 inch barrel.....

    Stay full snort 158 grain loads.  POA/POI are the same.

    As for exact slug, and in commercial loads?  Most all will work, but in playing around( A LOT) with this particular weight/caliber combo-  They need to be "original hot" 357 loads that clock AT LEAST 1250 out of your barrel( think cor-bon/buffalo bore/grizzly cartridge) for dead nuts reliable expansion.  The only premium HP slug that is forgiving and will reliably open at lower velocities is the speer gold dot.
    This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty. . . . The right of self defence is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any colour or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction- St. George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries

    Robinson

    • Senior Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 508

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #14 on: November 17, 2016, 11:51:26 pm »
    All guns used in self defense will cause harm/damage/ruin hearing regardless.  I'd rather come out the other side of a bad encounter still living.  I can buy hearing aides... I can't buy another life.

    I understand and respect that.  I had to switch to my current setup, which is IMO very suitable for defensive use, so I can continue to practice with my carry gun without causing further damage to my hearing.

    Thanks for the discussion.
    Georgia

    First Shirt

    • Senior Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 640
    • Retired zoomie intel geek

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #15 on: November 18, 2016, 12:23:37 am »
    The Boss is fond of the 160 gr. lead SWC from the Lee mold.  She uses them in her Ruger revolvers as well as her Rossi M-92 clone.  I don't know, since every time I bring a .357 firearm home, she claims them.  I just reload for the silly things.  But over a suitable amount of 2400, they seem to work really well.
    Alabama"Stand your ground!  Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here!"  Capt. John Parker

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #16 on: November 18, 2016, 01:07:54 am »
    The Boss is fond of the 160 gr. lead SWC from the Lee mold.  She uses them in her Ruger revolvers as well as her Rossi M-92 clone.  I don't know, since every time I bring a .357 firearm home, she claims them.  I just reload for the silly things.  But over a suitable amount of 2400, they seem to work really well.

    Consider yourself lucky. I wish I had a gal at home who would "borrow" my .357's for herself. Sounds like a keeper  :thumbup1.

    How heavy can .357 magnum get? I know that 158 gr is the standard. I was playing with one of Dad's reloading manuals and I saw a recipe for a very light .357 bullet that pushed at 1900 fps, I believe. I find that to be a very bizarre speed for .357, but when I asked him he said that was the correct recipe for it. Positively screaming.
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    coelacanth

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 10576
    • eccentric orbit

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #17 on: November 19, 2016, 12:19:19 am »
    I think 180 to 200 grains is pretty much the effective upper limit on .357 magnum loads.  You can get heavier bullets in that diameter - I've actually seen them up to 210 grains but in order to chamber them they have to be set so deeply into the case that you lose some powder capacity.  A fast burning powder can mitigate that to some degree but a lot of those loads can get finicky in terms of accuracy and the pressures can be erratic.

    Winchester used to load a 200 grain lead round nose bullet in a .38 special case which basically duplicated the .357 magnum load for that bullet because the shorter case allowed the overall length to work while seating the bullet slightly farther out.   :shrug

    I think just about everybody that produces ammo has at least one 180 grain .357 magnum load and some have 200 grainers listed as well but they are not as numerous as the 180's. 
    Arizona" A republic, if you can keep it."

                                                   Benjamin Franklin

    GeorgeHill

    • Co-Founder
    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 22154
    • The Ogre
      • MadOgre.com

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #18 on: November 20, 2016, 08:39:14 pm »
    In other words, when it comes to the anaemic handgun cartridge, the Ogre trusts his life to .357 magnum  >:D.
    Precisely.
    South CarolinaCo-Founder of WeTheArmed.com
    The Ogre from MadOgre.com.

    Vires et Honestas
    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
    http://www.madogre.com/

    GeorgeHill

    • Co-Founder
    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 22154
    • The Ogre
      • MadOgre.com

    • Offline
    Re: .357 Magnums from a short tube?
    « Reply #19 on: November 20, 2016, 08:41:20 pm »
    SP101, 357 mag., 3 inch barrel.....

    Stay full snort 158 grain loads.  POA/POI are the same.

    As for exact slug, and in commercial loads?  Most all will work, but in playing around( A LOT) with this particular weight/caliber combo-  They need to be "original hot" 357 loads that clock AT LEAST 1250 out of your barrel( think cor-bon/buffalo bore/grizzly cartridge) for dead nuts reliable expansion.  The only premium HP slug that is forgiving and will reliably open at lower velocities is the speer gold dot.
    Norse, I was hoping you would chime in on this one.  I value your sagely opinion... and blame you specifically for my SP101.  I had never forgotten yours that I reviewed for Concealed Carry Magazine. 
    Thank you.
    South CarolinaCo-Founder of WeTheArmed.com
    The Ogre from MadOgre.com.

    Vires et Honestas
    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
    http://www.madogre.com/

    Help support WeTheArmed.com by visiting our sponsors.