Author Topic: The Worst of SJW's. (Read 529447 times)

stephendutton · « **Reply #350 on:** December 19, 2016, 03:12:43 am »

A non-binary tumblr witch? What a great pile of warlocks.

WeTheArmed.com

cpaspr · « **Reply #351 on:** December 19, 2016, 08:10:42 pm »

Quote from: stephendutton on December 19, 2016, 03:12:43 am

A non-binary tumblr witch? What a great pile of warlocks.

Well, it's a pile of something.

Kaso · « **Reply #352 on:** December 20, 2016, 10:36:43 pm »

Quote from: MTK20 on December 19, 2016, 12:38:05 am

GOOD! Finally we are making some logical sense. That woman has to be allowed to identity as and live out her days as a CAT!!

WHY NOT? We as a society all fall over ourselves to accept anyone who wants to create their own new 'gender,' so why should a person not be allowed to identify as a Cat? Or a Fish? Or f___ that, I want to live as Frederick the f___ing Great! Why not??

Why? Because all of this transgender crap is rooted in mental illness. Look, I can understand a gay person. Maybe I don't like it, but they (for whatever reason) prefer their same sex. Trannys? No. You were born a male. Grow up. Man up. Deal with it. There is nothing wrong with you between your legs, only between your ears. The fact that people have enough leisure time or energy to worry about if they were 'correctly assigned at birth,' speaks to the fact that Americans as a people have become entirely too soft and weak. I hate to say it, but we need another Depression where people starve to death, so as to put what passes as our current crop of 'problems' into perspective.

Plebian · « **Reply #353 on:** December 21, 2016, 12:25:31 pm »

I guess I just do not see the problem with transexual at all. It seems to be a freedom thing IMO.

You wanna dress as the opposite gender and get surgery to appear as the opposite gender. Get after it. It is a free world do as you wish.

Establishing a legal third gender would not be unheard of either. There are many historic and modern societies that recognized 3 genders.

I would always want to err on the side of too much freedom and allowing individuals to do as they wish. If someone else wants to rearrange bits or add new bits to themselves. I just do not see where anyone else should really have a say.

Freedom seems to be the allowance of stupid actions in many cases.

Freedom also cuts the other way as well. Many manly women get called sir/him and many feminine men get called miss/her. If you are transgender and the 'transition' is going a bit rough. Then you are going to have to suck up being mislabeled. It is how life is, pull on your big girl panties/boxers and deal with it.

MTK20 · « **Reply #354 on:** December 21, 2016, 12:52:37 pm »

It's not about "you do you", though. They want everyone else to bend to their will as well. It's not enough to be or dress as one chooses, they wish to change our behaviour towards the- and they are all too ready to throw the weight of the law at anyone who doesn't comply or labels them incorrectly (such as we've seen in Canada).

Even worse then them being jerks about things, they are fluffing with science. They've turned the scientific political and in quite the clown shoes fashion.

Plebian · « **Reply #355 on:** December 21, 2016, 01:15:13 pm »

Quote from: MTK20 on December 21, 2016, 12:52:37 pm

It's not about "you do you", though. They want everyone else to bend to their will as well. It's not enough to be or dress as one chooses, they wish to change our behaviour towards the- and they are all too ready to throw the weight of the law at anyone who doesn't comply or labels them incorrectly (such as we've seen in Canada).

Even worse then them being jerks about things, they are fluffing with science. They've turned the scientific political and in quite the clown shoes fashion.

The key to them being able to use the law is the idea of protected classes of individual. The instant you recognize 'hate' crimes and therefore make protected classes. You will have folks attempting to make themselves part of the protected classes to reap the rewards of the system.

As far as science goes, it is a tool. All tools are political instruments to some degree. Science is only the pure search of truth when no one sees the use of the science. The instant it becomes actionable to help/hurt it will instantly feel the pressure of society and the law.

Kaso · « **Reply #356 on:** December 21, 2016, 01:44:18 pm »

Quote from: Plebian on December 21, 2016, 12:25:31 pm

I guess I just do not see the problem with transexual at all. It seems to be a freedom thing IMO.

.....

I would always want to err on the side of too much freedom and allowing individuals to do as they wish. If someone else wants to rearrange bits or add new bits to themselves. I just do not see where anyone else should really have a say.

Allowing more freedom is a nice idea. Allowing too much freedom is anarchy. The age-old question, where do we draw that line?

Myself, I prefer to live in a unified, orderly society. That means action to make sure everyone makes an effort to 'fit in' to a degree. Should a person be 'allowed' to carve themselves up? Sure. Should society have to play along to their fantasies and delusions? No. If a person chooses the above modification, should the rest of us ridicule them and make them feel foolish? Absolutely.

I would not want legislation or governmental pressure to accomplish this. Societal pressure would do nicely.

Chief45 · « **Reply #357 on:** December 21, 2016, 02:24:32 pm »

EDP. (emotionally disturbed person).

I deal with EDP's on a weekly and sometimes daily basis.

Most are harmless, some are amusing, some you just tolerate their "individualism". (think http://www.peopleofwalmart.com/) level.

A few are harmful, either to themselves or, rarely, others.

They can call themselves what ever they want. it don't change what they are.

freeman1685 · « **Reply #358 on:** December 21, 2016, 02:30:00 pm »

Quote from: Kaso on December 21, 2016, 01:44:18 pm

Allowing too much freedom is anarchy.

You say that like it's a bad thing.

There is no such thing as too much freedom. And anarchy is not necessarily an absence of order (contrary to what some might believe), but more an absence of a formal governmental body.

MTK20 · « **Reply #359 on:** December 21, 2016, 02:54:25 pm »

Quote from: freeman1685 on December 21, 2016, 02:30:00 pm

You say that like it's a bad thing.

There is no such thing as too much freedom. And anarchy is not necessarily an absence of order (contrary to what some might believe), but more an absence of a formal governmental body.

Maybe you can explain this concept better then myself or Jesse could.

I agree whole heartedly though. There has been quite the effort to paint anarchy as something that is evil, violent, and criminal. The fact of the matter is that it is the most peaceful political ideology, because it is the only one to have no state standing army. Not to mention the non-aggression principle, which so many who are pro-self government believe in and follow as an ethical principle.

freeman1685 · « **Reply #360 on:** December 21, 2016, 07:01:57 pm »

Quote from: MTK20 on December 21, 2016, 02:54:25 pm

Maybe you can explain this concept better then myself or Jesse could.

I agree whole heartedly though. There has been quite the effort to paint anarchy as something that is evil, violent, and criminal. The fact of the matter is that it is the most peaceful political ideology, because it is the only one to have no state standing army. Not to mention the non-aggression principle, which so many who are pro-self government believe in and follow as an ethical principle.

Mind you, this is my view. I'm sure that there are some that will disagree, and come up with some article, written by some professed hard line anarchist to prove their point.

Let's examine the suffix "arch." In this context, it means several things (without going into the minutia of word roots, dialects and other such): To lead, head of, rule/ruler. The United States a polyarchy, or as we refer to it a "republic." Great Briton is a monarchy. The head of a family, is referred to as a patri/matriarch. ISIS is attempting to build a religious oligarchy.

Anarchy, again in this context, doesn't mean anti government. The way "non-aggression" does not mean "pacifist." All in all, it basically means, "You leave me alone, I'll leave you alone."

Kaso · « **Reply #361 on:** December 21, 2016, 10:50:21 pm »

Quote from: freeman1685 on December 21, 2016, 02:30:00 pm

You say that like it's a bad thing.

There is no such thing as too much freedom. And anarchy is not necessarily an absence of order (contrary to what some might believe), but more an absence of a formal governmental body.

I do. When I say 'anarchy,' I mean 'chaos.' Too much freedom leads to chaos, due to a lack of enforced societal structure. People are inefficient and illogical by nature, and they need structure and order to reach their highest potential. Both individually, and as a group.

Quote from: MTK20 on December 21, 2016, 02:54:25 pm

There has been quite the effort to paint anarchy as something that is evil, violent, and criminal.

Humans are evil, violent, and criminal. It is our natural state. One that we fall back to when the threat of penal violence or social ostracization is removed as a consequence for bad behavior. And sometimes even with that threat remaining.

aikorob · « **Reply #362 on:** December 23, 2016, 09:25:33 am »

Finally, someone has stepped up to help in this time of butt-hurtedness:
http://savethesnowflakes.org/

MTK20 · « **Reply #363 on:** December 23, 2016, 09:35:58 am »

Quote from: aikorob on December 23, 2016, 09:25:33 am

Finally, someone has stepped up to help in this time of butt-hurtedness:
http://savethesnowflakes.org/

MTK20 · « **Reply #364 on:** December 23, 2016, 11:24:57 pm »

This was a great short film

.

MTK20 · « **Reply #365 on:** December 27, 2016, 08:36:43 pm »

coelacanth · « **Reply #366 on:** December 28, 2016, 12:27:36 am »

"The Privilege Game" . . . I want my 8 minutes back.

"Resolutions for white guys" . . . Yes, by all means, let me be preached to by the same people who have been experiencing mass hysteria at the mere thought of a Trump administration with a Republican congressional majority.

freeman1685 · « **Reply #367 on:** December 28, 2016, 02:15:38 am »

I gotta wonder what kind of screwed up mirror these dips___s are looking in. Have they not noticed that they themselves are white? Like the nitwit perfesser and his BS about "White Genocide?"

MTK20 · « **Reply #368 on:** December 29, 2016, 07:01:26 am »

An interview with the man that Zarna tried to destroy.

MTK20 · « **Reply #369 on:** December 29, 2016, 07:36:09 am »

When your first world country is doing so well, that you have to invent s___ to be upset about. Spoiler alert: it's all men's fault, like always

.

MTK20 · « **Reply #370 on:** December 29, 2016, 10:06:47 pm »

coelacanth · « **Reply #371 on:** December 29, 2016, 11:19:24 pm »

I like "Bearing's" new avatar .

MTK20 · « **Reply #372 on:** December 29, 2016, 11:22:15 pm »

Quote from: coelacanth on December 29, 2016, 11:19:24 pm

I like "Bearing's" new avatar .

Me too. It's bigger and bear-er than before.

Sorry, I couldn't resist

.

stephendutton · « **Reply #373 on:** December 30, 2016, 04:51:53 am »

Quote from: MTK20 on December 29, 2016, 11:22:15 pm

Me too. It's bigger and bear-er than before.

Sorry, I couldn't resist .

He revealed his actual face on his other channel and I couldn't help but think that the bear avatar was very appropriate.

MTK20 · « **Reply #374 on:** December 31, 2016, 10:07:28 am »

I wonder if society will degrade to the point where they will flat out say that anyone born of Anglo descent is automatically evil, regardless of said person's character. This is a very toxic and racist ideology.