Author Topic: The Worst of SJW's. (Read 529501 times)

coelacanth · « **Reply #200 on:** November 05, 2016, 09:40:37 pm »

When you find yourself out maneuvered, out gunned and unable to impress your adversary in any way, the only course that makes any sense is to withdraw. Or queue on the right in this case.

WeTheArmed.com

MTK20 · « **Reply #201 on:** November 05, 2016, 09:44:20 pm »

Quote from: coelacanth on November 05, 2016, 09:40:37 pm

When you find yourself out maneuvered, out gunned and unable to impress your adversary in any way, the only course that makes any sense is to withdraw. Or queue on the right in this case.

Logically Milo wasn't outgunned, the opposition just was unimpressed and boorish

.

I'm sure that they had a very polite convo after his 5 minutes break was over

.

coelacanth · « **Reply #202 on:** November 05, 2016, 09:55:17 pm »

Au contraire, mon ami . When your only fallback position is to increase the volume level of your question/accusation - you are INDEED outgunned by any measure. And I seriously doubt there was any waiting around for polite conversation afterwards. Once you've been bested in a public forum, most of that ilk have no stomach for a second helping.

MTK20 · « **Reply #203 on:** November 07, 2016, 10:47:23 pm »

coelacanth · « **Reply #204 on:** November 08, 2016, 01:08:14 am »

At about the 1:30 mark in the video you can see just how popular she is as a featured speaker. You're likely to see more people waiting at the Toronto subway platform than were in that auditorium. I wonder if the Canadian health care program has a body mass index measurement? That probably ticks her off as well.

That brings to mind a question that this thread has not yet answered. Is there a hierarchy of offense? I understand that there is a whole catalog of things that Social Justice Wankers find objectionable but I think it would be useful to have some sort of guide to refer to for those of us who are not part of the cognoscenti.

A ranking system of some sort from the truly grave and heinous offenses down to the merely annoying ones would be helpful.

I hesitate to even mention the entertainment value of watching a group of the perpetually offended trying to determine who among them is the most aggrieved.

MTK20 · « **Reply #205 on:** November 08, 2016, 01:11:37 am »

Quote from: coelacanth on November 08, 2016, 01:08:14 am

At about the 1:30 mark in the video you can see just how popular she is as a featured speaker. You're likely to see more people waiting at the Toronto subway platform than were in that auditorium. I wonder if the Canadian health care program has a body mass index measurement? That probably ticks her off as well.

That brings to mind a question that this thread has not yet answered. Is there a hierarchy of offense? I understand that there is a whole catalog of things that Social Justice Wankers find objectionable but I think it would be useful to have some sort of guide to refer to for those of us who are not part of the cognoscenti. A ranking system of some sort from the truly grave and heinous offenses down to the merely annoying ones would be helpful.

Sir, I have got to be up early and on campus tomorrow, but give me a few and I'll see what I can find. If I cannot quote a respected authority on the subject matter at hand, I will list my own take on things via what I have gathered in the field.

As long as I have spent in the belly of the beast, I would assume that I can come up with something on my own if given a bit to ponder it

.

MTK20 · « **Reply #206 on:** November 08, 2016, 09:36:47 am »

"Apologise for your opinion". Those are fighting words.

This reminds me of an interview I listened to in the radio about the demolishing of western science and making new indigenous science. The woman that the ABC was interviewing was a crunchy granola feminist type who said that while western science is bad, she has a dream about a rock teaching her the history of her people and so she found that rock and talked with it for decades. This is what she said should be taught and in the textbooks.

If I can find that interview, I'll post it because it was..... It was fascinating stuff....

.

MTK20 · « **Reply #207 on:** November 08, 2016, 10:03:00 am »

MTK20 · « **Reply #208 on:** November 08, 2016, 07:18:49 pm »

MTK20 · « **Reply #209 on:** November 08, 2016, 07:33:10 pm »

Kaso · « **Reply #210 on:** November 08, 2016, 07:38:49 pm »

Quote from: MTK20 on November 08, 2016, 07:18:49 pm

This is the best answer to the question that I have ever heard. It's not about morals, or feelings, or opinions, but Fact. Trannies can carve themselves up into whatever they wish, but chromosomes are chromosomes.

coelacanth · « **Reply #211 on:** November 08, 2016, 10:27:33 pm »

Regarding reply #206 : Apparently apples do not fall from trees in Africa - or if they do it has not been observed by Africans - or if it has,
they attribute it to black magic instead of gravity.

coelacanth · « **Reply #212 on:** November 08, 2016, 10:30:02 pm »

Regarding reply # 207 : I've said it before but it bears repeating. Professor Peterson has the patience of a saint. I wonder if he ever gets
tired of checkmating the opposition?

coelacanth · « **Reply #213 on:** November 08, 2016, 10:32:37 pm »

Regarding reply # 208 : Mr. Shapiro uses reason, logic and the language like a surgeon uses a scalpel. Very nice.

coelacanth · « **Reply #214 on:** November 08, 2016, 10:35:05 pm »

Regarding reply # 209 : Sometimes you eat the bear and sometimes the bear eats you. Unless you're a brainless femtard. In that case the
bear always eats you.

MTK20 · « **Reply #215 on:** November 08, 2016, 10:45:40 pm »

Quote from: coelacanth on November 08, 2016, 10:30:02 pm

Regarding reply # 207 : I've said it before but it bears repeating. Professor Peterson has the patience of a saint. I wonder if he ever gets
tired of checkmating the opposition?

Most definitely, I think we may need to keep an eye on him, as he could be a regular on this thread if he keeps up his fantastic debates. I love how he doesn't make it a SJW issue, he makes it a constitutional rights issue.

Quote from: coelacanth on November 08, 2016, 10:32:37 pm

Regarding reply # 208 : Mr. Shapiro uses reason, logic and the language like a surgeon uses a scalpel. Very nice.

Agreed. He is my continued inspiration on what to aspire to when debating others.

Quote from: coelacanth on November 08, 2016, 10:35:05 pm

Regarding reply # 209 : Sometimes you eat the bear and sometimes the bear eats you. Unless you're a brainless femtard. In that case the
bear always eats you.

Bearing is a top bloke

. Sure he has a foul mouth, but that is mainly a culture divide. He actually is much more poltie and friendly than Undoomed. I also enjoy Undoomed though as well

.

MTK20 · « **Reply #216 on:** November 09, 2016, 08:21:25 pm »

http://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/a8261651/donald-trump-victory-failed-women/

America failed women somehow, because Donald Trump won the election.

coelacanth · « **Reply #217 on:** November 10, 2016, 01:06:47 am »

Read that one. Then read the other related articles posted alongside it.

What a crock of sh*t. I think I need a shower.

I've heard a lot of talk in the last 24 hours about "unity" and "the need to come together and solve our problems" and lots of other high sounding rhetoric but the people writing these blogs and articles aren't constrained by the need to put on a good face for the TV cameras and make the best of it. Their rhetoric is as vile and disturbing as it was in the weeks leading up to the election. If anything they seem to have lost what little self restraint they may have had prior to their stunning defeat.
No less a personage than our "esteemed" current president reminded us, after his inauguration, that he won and that elections have consequences. Indeed. I hope our "friends" on the left are ready for a heaping helping of consequences.

MTK20 · « **Reply #218 on:** November 10, 2016, 07:59:12 pm »

MTK20 · « **Reply #219 on:** November 10, 2016, 08:39:18 pm »

coelacanth · « **Reply #220 on:** November 11, 2016, 12:46:31 pm »

OK. She convinced me. I'm an egalitarian.

MTK20 · « **Reply #221 on:** November 11, 2016, 01:19:51 pm »

Quote from: coelacanth on November 11, 2016, 12:46:31 pm

OK. She convinced me. I'm an egalitarian.

I am as well

. While at first blush, people often confuse the two as being the same, I've actually got a pretty good explanation to differentiate the two.

Egalitarianism- men and women are seen as equals.

Third gen fem- Misandrist religious cult with faux equality talking points and typified by whinging, an outrage/victim complex, and public histrionics.

For example, if you are naked and destroying public property at the local church with a chainsaw, you might either be crazier than Hitler's house cat, or just a feminist fighting the unseen patriarchy. I'm really not sure if there is a difference between the two

.

Kaso · « **Reply #222 on:** November 11, 2016, 01:35:53 pm »

Quote from: coelacanth on November 11, 2016, 12:46:31 pm

OK. She convinced me. I'm an egalitarian.

Quote from: MTK20 on November 11, 2016, 01:19:51 pm

I am as well . While at first blush, people often confuse the two as being the same, I've actually got a pretty good explanation to differentiate the two.

MTK20 · « **Reply #223 on:** November 11, 2016, 01:48:09 pm »

Sock Monkey · « **Reply #224 on:** November 11, 2016, 03:20:40 pm »

Quote from: MTK20 on November 09, 2016, 08:21:25 pm

http://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/a8261651/donald-trump-victory-failed-women/

America failed women somehow, because Donald Trump won the election.

The writer/whiner repeatedly asserts that Clinton is a superbly-qualified candidate with "decades of experience." (It's actually 15 years experience.) I can't tell if people actually believe that, or if they're just pushing a talking a point.