Help support WeTheArmed.com by visiting our sponsors.

Author Topic: The Worst of SJW's.  (Read 529463 times)

MTK20

  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 8251
  • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

  • Offline
Re: The Worst of SJW's.
« Reply #175 on: October 30, 2016, 08:44:47 pm »
Texas
Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

WeTheArmed.com

  • Advertisement
  • ***

    coelacanth

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 10576
    • eccentric orbit

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #176 on: October 31, 2016, 02:03:57 am »
    Kudos to Mr. shapiro.   Teeing it up and hitting it long.    :thumbup1
    Arizona" A republic, if you can keep it."

                                                   Benjamin Franklin

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #177 on: November 02, 2016, 08:54:09 am »


    I'm glad to see a politician stand up and say that disagreeing with someone does not equal racism.
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    stephendutton

    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 2554
    • Is a man-eating anteater still an anteater?
      • The Hazug Files

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #178 on: November 02, 2016, 01:30:58 pm »


    I'm glad to see a politician stand up and say that disagreeing with someone does not equal racism.

    I find this very relevant to myself right now. Ever since the UK's vote to leave the EU I've seen all sorts of Remain supporting politicians claiming that "the people voted for <insert chosen reason why we can't leave the EU or need another referendum here>." But I've not heard a single one of them actually get my motives for voting to leave right.
    My website is back! It features over 100 pieces of fan fiction set in the Star Trek, Star Wars and Warhammer 40,000 universes.
    http://thehazugfiles.uk/Index.htm

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #179 on: November 03, 2016, 09:11:44 pm »


    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    coelacanth

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 10576
    • eccentric orbit

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #180 on: November 04, 2016, 12:12:47 am »
    Good ones.   :cool   I wonder if the Clintons and their circle of accomplices ever have nightmares starring Trey Gowdy as the U. S. Attorney General?    :panic   

    Milo really hits them where they live.  Nothing makes you question your whole ideology quite like getting napalmed in your "safe space".    :clap
    Arizona" A republic, if you can keep it."

                                                   Benjamin Franklin

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #181 on: November 04, 2016, 12:27:17 am »
    Good ones.   :cool   I wonder if the Clintons and their circle of accomplices ever have nightmares starring Trey Gowdy as the U. S. Attorney General?    :panic   

    Milo really hits them where they live.  Nothing makes you question your whole ideology quite like getting napalmed in your "safe space".    :clap

    Thank you! :hat

    I was shocked by the quote from Mrs. Paglia. I'm sure the thought of attributing any positive qualities or achievements to men would have most of today's third gen fems thrown into frothing, convulsing, trigglypuff-esque fits  :panic.
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    coelacanth

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 10576
    • eccentric orbit

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #182 on: November 04, 2016, 12:42:04 am »
    Well, it seemed to be just a throw-away line for Milo but when he made the point about all the jobs where you simply never see women working he nailed it.  When's the last time you saw a woman up on a roof toting 60 pound packs of asphalt shingles up to the comb of a steeply pitched roof?   The best welder in our high school AG shop class was a girl but oddly enough she decided it wasn't a viable career option.   I don't think I've ever seen a woman on a crew pouring concrete either now that I think about it.   There's a reason that dirty, dangerous, physically demanding jobs usually get done by men.    I know it.  You know it.  Milo knows it.  Ms. Paglia knows it.  And, the dirty little secret is that every femtard out there also knows it, deep down in the dark recesses of her consciousness where dogma confronts objective truth and loses every time. 
    Arizona" A republic, if you can keep it."

                                                   Benjamin Franklin

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #183 on: November 04, 2016, 01:15:18 am »
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #184 on: November 04, 2016, 01:27:12 am »
    Well, it seemed to be just a throw-away line for Milo but when he made the point about all the jobs where you simply never see women working he nailed it.  When's the last time you saw a woman up on a roof toting 60 pound packs of asphalt shingles up to the comb of a steeply pitched roof?   The best welder in our high school AG shop class was a girl but oddly enough she decided it wasn't a viable career option.   I don't think I've ever seen a woman on a crew pouring concrete either now that I think about it.   There's a reason that dirty, dangerous, physically demanding jobs usually get done by men.    I know it.  You know it.  Milo knows it.  Ms. Paglia knows it.  And, the dirty little secret is that every femtard out there also knows it, deep down in the dark recesses of her consciousness where dogma confronts objective truth and loses every time.

    Agreed, he did kind of use it as an after thought, but while I've never read the book which he took it from I am sure that it wasn't used incorrectly or out of context.

    That is kind of a shame that she didn't choose that as a career choice. If a woman wants to go into a field dominated by men, I try to always support them. My little sister (step sibling) was kicking around being an engineer and my Grandmother worked in and retired from a factory up north.

    I'm thankful that I have had the privilege to know many strong willed women with good work ethics and it is no exaggeration to state that the great majority of those who have influence on me in life, from mentors, co-workers, and friends have in fact been women. That is one of the things that pisses me off about feminists, because I am surrounded by such strong, admirable, and feminine company- that I look at these clips of women online and wonder "where did they come from?". It is as if 3rd gen fems strive to be dependent and piss weak. Yes everyone needs advocates and I mean everyone. Even us white, toxic masculinity filled, males  :neener. But the women I know don't whine about not having people fighting for them. If no one will fight for them, they will put on the gloves and fight for themselves. If they have no one to speak for them, they can make noise all their own.

    And contrary to popular belief, they don't need a woman in the white house in order for them to be the most honourable, best versions of themselves that they can be.
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    coelacanth

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 10576
    • eccentric orbit

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #185 on: November 04, 2016, 01:38:42 am »
    Well said.  Your experience echoes my own to some degree.  Lots of strong, capable women in my life as well and I imagine all of them would have a good laugh at the antics of today's feminists(?).
    Arizona" A republic, if you can keep it."

                                                   Benjamin Franklin

    Kaso

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 7239
    • WTA Hardline Antagonist (aka: Jerk)

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #186 on: November 04, 2016, 12:35:12 pm »
    And, the dirty little secret is that every femtard out there also knows it, deep down in the dark recesses of her consciousness where dogma confronts objective truth and loses every time. 
    See, I don't think feminists really want parity with men in the construction and 'dirty' industries.  Some do, I am sure...  Most do not.  What they really want to have, is something to b____ about.  "Look at all those men running heavy equipment!  Patriarchy!!!!!!"

    They b____ about a wage gap that is mostly self-created.  They b____ about not being equally represented in every facet of life, when really the only place they want more positions is the board room.  Executive positions.  What they want is the opportunity to order others (particularly men) around, call the budgetary shots, make decisions that should probably be left to others more qualified, and then collect huge severance pay when they are fired for incompetence.

    Methinks someone ought to introduce them to the institution of Marriage.  That's basically what they want, though no feminist would ever admit it.  Boss around the husband.  Spend his money.  Make decisions that no one else wants, (that he pays for) and then collect alimony when he finds out she has been playing for another team.

    stephendutton

    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 2554
    • Is a man-eating anteater still an anteater?
      • The Hazug Files

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #187 on: November 04, 2016, 02:06:29 pm »
    Well here's an example of one feminist's view of how the world ought to be. Basically it reds like a fascist version of the stone age in which the human race will be doomed to extinction within a few decades.

    https://witchwind.wordpress.com/2014/10/07/utopia-what-would-a-womens-society-look-like/

    Quote

    UTOPIA: what would a women’s society look like?

     Published October 7, 2014

     

    I haven’t been writing in a while, and it’s not because I don’t like writing any more but things have accelerated elsewhere in my life and I can’t be involved everywhere at once. As this isn’t paid work, obviously I can’t afford to put blogging first.

    Anyway, there are still many posts waiting to be finished. In the meantime, I’ll start another one.

    I often muse about all the things that we’d need to change about patriarchy if we abolished men’s rule over women and the earth. Everything and every single aspect of social organisation is so much the opposite of how it should be, it’s dizzying to even begin to think about all the things we should stop / change.

    Mostly it’s about men stopping from doing harm. But stopping men isn’t enough because beyond that there is the entire world to relearn, to heal, and our entire society to rebuild. We would be faced with the immense task of replacing all the misogynist, genocidal, biocidal practices men have ordered our society with for eons. So many of us now are acculturated, cut from land, nature and from one another.

    If we managed to overcome men’s tyranny over us, how would we rebuild our world? I just want to throw some ideas here that I often come across these days. I dream for concrete, down-to-earth, simple and easily applicable measures of stepping out of patriarchy into a female-loving, biophilic world. This isn’t by any means a realistic plan of how to achieve it, but just reading it makes me feel happy. It makes it feel more real, more possible. Enjoy!

    SOCIAL STRUCTURES

    Men’s position in society

    Before we do anything, the very first measure to adopt is to take all men out of all positions of decision-making immediately, and actually out of any kind of social, professional position whatsoever.

    Major serial killers, serial torturers, pimps, pornographers, severe domestic abusers, serial rapists, genocide planners, biocide planners and pedocriminals across the world will simply be euthanised: the decisions will be taken by women in a mass world tribunal for patriarchal crimes. This is by far the best solution, and is the most legitimate, ethical way of reducing male population to more reasonable levels. Such men would otherwise forever pose a threat to women, children, animals, the earth and society as a whole, and we know they have no chance of ceasing their violent behaviour after having reached such an advanced stage of sadism and sociopathy. It would be reckless to spend space, resources and energy in keeping them alive in prisons.

    All of men’s (alive and euthanised) belongings, property, resources and land will be confiscated from men and handed back to female care and supervision – property rights over land will be abolished. You can’t own land!

    All men at least above 15 (or younger if very asocial) should live separately from women and children, on their own in small huts or studios, isolated from one another and scattered around so that women can keep an eye on them (they should never be in groups or packs, that would be illegal). So it would also be illegal for male adults to impose their presence on females, girls and children. Men would have to care for themselves on their own: food, laundry, etc. No male above his age of puberty would be allowed to receive any kind of service from a female. Their life expectancy would probably drop to the age of 40, but that’s how things should be. Women’s life expectancy without men would rise to 130 years at least.

    PIV would be illegal too of course, as well as the initiation of any verbal or physical contact to women and girls or boy children, unless solicited by a woman for specific matters. I’m not sure what to do about boy children. Obviously you know my opinion, but let’s say that’s up to the mother to decide what she wants to do before he turns of age to leave the female family circle.

    In order to keep all men and post-pubescent boys busy, we’d send them to clean up the vast amounts of detritus, pollution and toxic wastes men have littered and almost killed the world with. Much of the damage to the earth is irreversible, however with a great deal of effort and genius, women will find sustainable, natural and simple ways of healing a lot of the damage men have caused, and send men off to do the dirty work. No man will be allowed to take any decision without female guidance. We know what happens when men decide on their own! DISASTER.

    Family, child-raising and reproduction

    Fathers’ rights will cease to exist. There is no such thing as fatherhood — as we all know, it’s a myth. Men will necessarily lose all and any power to dominate and control women’s reproductive capacities.

    It’s the inalienable right of each woman to control every phase of her reproduction and life creation. Abortion will be possible at any stage of pregnancy, however there will hardly be such a thing as undesired pregnancy since there won’t be any men forcing pregnancies on us any more. Abortion will nonetheless be recognised for the trauma, mutilation and loss of life that it is. The number of children and human population will naturally decrease to sustainable levels, so will the number of males born. Women will be free to experiment parthenogenesis or procreation with two female eggs.

    The nuclear family will be abolished, in particular the parent’s property rights and absolute power over her child. Children will be considered as persons in need for autonomy and all form of punishment, authority or educational manipulation over children will equally be abolished. Raising and caring for children will be a collective responsibility for women, and motherhood / childcare and especially capacity to be empathetic towards children will be taken very seriously, as something that needs to be (re)learned and studied over years before being fully competent for this immense task.

    Schools as we know them as punitive reclusion centres for grooming into male domination and female subordination (as well as selection system for elite executors of patriarchal institutions) will be abolished. Boys would definitely not be around the girls, certainly not most of the time, and never beyond the age of puberty. And obviously no adult male would be allowed near children.

    There will be no such thing as “teachers” with positions of authority over children. “Guiders” could learn also from the children or students as much the students from them. We’d learn anything we’d want from languages to sciences to art to music to medicine to building to witchcraft to swimming (etc) without restriction of age or time, as long as it’s adapted to our capacities, level and availability. Learning would be autonomous, with guidance when needed, instead of enforced and dictated. They’d be no need for external reward, marking or punishment because the process of learning in itself is so rewarding and fascinating that it’s self-sufficient. Anyway I could go on and on, non-patriarchal learning is truly riveting.

    Social structures between women.

    All relationships of authority, domination and subordination will be abolished between all women of all ages. We will be able to recognise each other’s strengths, expertise, guidance and capacities (or lack of) without it implying superiority, inferiority, veneration or lack of respect. We would find each other beautiful. We would live our friendships, love and affection for women unhindered.

    MEN’S INSTITUTIONS

    All oppressive male institutions will be abolished after men have been retrieved from them. We obviously won’t keep these institutions. They will return to the nothingness that they belong, just as a distant, bad memory.

    Military:

    No more military, no more army, no more wars! It would be illegal for men to hold weapons. Global peace would be the immediate consequence. Most weapons will be destroyed (or recycled into something else), such as weapons of mass destruction, anti-personnel mines, tanks, machine guns, all manners of terrestrial, marine and air-bombers, and all the many disgusting things men have invented. For the remaining weapons such as guns or blades, women will hold exclusive right of use over them in order to defend ourselves from men, from the risk of them taking power over us again.

    State:

    States, borders, nations, laws would be abolished and totally dispensed with. Laws mentioning the number of prohibited acts will be kept for men only. Women do not need laws to contain ourselves. Laws were created by the male elite to protect their property from other men. Laws are rigid and static, that’s because their purpose is to hold existing patriarchal powers in place. Our own society would be in constant evolution, improvement, creative renewal, yet grounded in reality and adapted to our needs and circumstances.

    Women would be able to move freely.

    Societal structures and decision-making assemblies wouldn’t exceed roughly 300 women (representing no more than themselves). Keeping numbers low for cooperation is important because the greater the size of the unit, the more horizontal cooperation becomes difficult and requires vertical hierarchy. Possibilities for peaceful, cooperative organisation between women are infinite – as long as they respect the individual integrity of every female – the group should never weigh over the individual but be a source for support and efficient organisation of collective life and space. There could easily be associations of exchange between different groups and peoples in order for women to cooperate regionally and globally where necessary. There would be no limit in age of participation in decision-making for women and girls, which means adapting the format to different ages and capacities.

    Medicine:

    Men would be permanently banned from any kind of medical practice. All woman-hating, genocidal institutions such as gynecology, psychiatry, obstetrics, big pharma, the torture of living beings in the name of “scientific experimentation” will be banned. Men’s fragmented, objectifying, sadistic view the human body will be part of history, replaced by biophilic medicine. Medical science will no longer be monopolised by a small elite but available to all at any age where appropriate. The (female) doctor’s role will be to guide the patient in her own healing, never to exercise authority over her or take decisions at her expense. Special healing spaces (where surgery is necessary, etc) will be so nice, warm and welcoming that just being there will make you feel better. The soul and life conditions of a person will always be considered part of the body, and symptoms will always be understood in a holistic way. There will be no more chemical, synthetic and toxic products with often worse side effects than the illness itself it claims to heal.

    Perfect health would be the normal state of women anyway, as we will learn by experience and observation what we should eat and do to stay healthy at all seasons and times. Most women will have rediscovered our healing, divination and extra-sensory communication powers.

    Religion:

    Patriarchal religions will crumble down with men’s oppressive system. Religious ideologies, along with its hierarchies and vacuous rituals will cease to exist. I believe a woman’s world would be spiritual. Spiritual connection isn’t based on faith but on critical observation and experience, on a real personal connection to the elements, beings and spirits that surround us, and on the real magnetic power of beings.

    Economy (tied to ecology):

    Obviously, Slavery, men’s exploitation of women, men’s capitalist systems will be abolished too. The most important aspect of male economy is that it’s based on men’s competitive accumulation of resources (by killing, destroying, commodifying, taking control over, extracting the greatest possible amount of life) and based on production of poisonous, addictive, programmed obsolescent goods — in order to win the patriarchal game of achieving greater domination over women and girls.

    This necrophilic relationship to the world and the environment will be abolished, to be replaced by biophilic ecological and economic principles. This will encompass every single process of our life activities, from house building, to food consumption, to communication, travelling, furniture making, cooking, etc. They will have to be carefully designed and thought out in a way as to never endanger the survival of any species, never pollute any environment, never require the use of poisonous, non-recyclable materials, never to require indentured labour or exploitation in order to be maintained. This would obviously impact the nature and scale of our activities. “Work” (exploitation and division of labour) as we know it would disappear. It would be the responsibility of each individual or group to sustain herself more or less autonomously.

    We should learn to observe our environment and deeply understand the interconnectedness of all beings around us, as well our own impact before deciding whether or how to transform it. Our lives have no more or no less value than those of a rabbit, fly, tree, plant, fish, seashell or stone. For instance, if we pick leaves of some plants, it’s important not to rip the whole plant off, to take only parts of it so it can grow again. Or to only take a few plants (or seashells, whatever) where there are many, so to respect the survival of the species where it is settled. If we cut trees to build our house, replant them. There are also infinite ways of making the most of materials for energy, food or production while using it as efficiently as possible. Building houses in ways that don’t require heating in winter or cooling in the summer. It is now widely known that energy such as electricity can be infinitely renewable if we use wind power, magnetic power, water power… And everything can be made DIY.

    We will learn to be autonomous again and make our own clothes, food, furniture, houses, soaps, detergent products – or maybe someone else will make them but most things can be handmade and it’s so much more rewarding.

    In a biophilic world, nothing is garbage, nothing is pollution. Everything is conceived so as to be part of a life cycle. This doesn’t mean we should keep the same toothbrush for 50 years or never improve on our machines, technology and infrastructure, but there’s no such thing as a dump, or toxic spilling. All materials should be harmless, recyclable or biodegradable, given back the earth if we no longer need them.

    Industrial agriculture and farming:

    Genetic modification of plants, pesticides, monoculture, field ploughing and consequent aridification of the land will be considered criminal. Our right to self-sustenance would no more be confiscated by mega food corporations – as they will no longer exist.

    Agriculture should always be small-scale, local, and as much as possible be modelled on wildlife, self-growing / self-renewing conditions (the less work and intervention, the better), and especially be conceived so as to nourish and sustain rather than deplete wildlife and environmental balance. Again, possibilities are infinite, we have so much to learn.

    And seriously, killing animals you’ve raised yourself in a farm or keeping animals enclosed is cruel. I’m for the liberation of all farm and domestic animals. It’s up to them to decide whether they want to live with us or not, and they should be able to come and go freely. Maybe after a few decades, after the human population has stalled, male population has decreased, and after we’ve made serious efforts for reforestation and restoration of wildlife on the earth, it would probably be fairer to hunt animals occasionally. Right now, given the extinction rate of animal species, I find it criminal to hunt or fish. We don’t need to eat that much meat anyway.

    ****

    This post is already too long!

    I hope you got the point of it though. It isn’t so much as dictating what women should do but establishing basic principles of respect of life and female integrity along which we can devise an infinite number of possibilities.

    My website is back! It features over 100 pieces of fan fiction set in the Star Trek, Star Wars and Warhammer 40,000 universes.
    http://thehazugfiles.uk/Index.htm

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #188 on: November 04, 2016, 02:22:37 pm »
    Methinks someone ought to introduce them to the institution of Marriage.  That's basically what they want, though no feminist would ever admit it.  Boss around the husband.  Spend his money.  Make decisions that no one else wants, (that he pays for) and then collect alimony when he finds out she has been playing for another team.

    :shocked

    If I'm allowed to state the obvious, that scenario sounds most disagreeable.
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #189 on: November 04, 2016, 02:32:40 pm »
    Well here's an example of one feminist's view of how the world ought to be. Basically it reds like a fascist version of the stone age in which the human race will be doomed to extinction within a few decades.

    https://witchwind.wordpress.com/2014/10/07/utopia-what-would-a-womens-society-look-like/

    I appreciate you posting this, but I couldn't make it through the entire article. When I got to the part of how Women don't need laws to contain themselves, because only Men are impulsive and lack self-control, I was done with it.
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    Kaso

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 7239
    • WTA Hardline Antagonist (aka: Jerk)

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #190 on: November 04, 2016, 02:41:51 pm »
    :shocked

    If I'm allowed to state the obvious, that scenario sounds most disagreeable.
    You can call it as you like, but that is the textbook description of a marriage with a stay at home wife.  Some are better, some are worse.

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #191 on: November 04, 2016, 02:45:24 pm »
    You can call it as you like, but that is the textbook description of a marriage with a stay at home wife.  Some are better, some are worse.

    I don't think we are disagreeing here Kaso, we both agree that the scenario as you explained it above is not a fun one to be in :coffee .

    That being said, there are some good Women out there. You just have to look really hard to find them :cool.
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    Kaso

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 7239
    • WTA Hardline Antagonist (aka: Jerk)

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #192 on: November 04, 2016, 02:47:55 pm »
    Well here's an example of one feminist's view of how the world ought to be. Basically it reds like a fascist version of the stone age in which the human race will be doomed to extinction within a few decades.

    https://witchwind.wordpress.com/2014/10/07/utopia-what-would-a-womens-society-look-like/

    I don't think that was actually meant to be taken seriously.  If it was, someone is off of her meds.

    Kaso

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 7239
    • WTA Hardline Antagonist (aka: Jerk)

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #193 on: November 04, 2016, 02:50:14 pm »
    I don't think we are disagreeing here Kaso, we both agree that the scenario as you explained it above is not a fun one to be in :coffee .
    If you look past how the situation would make you feel personally, and to what I originally said, what feminists really want out of life is a position that has been afforded women since the beginning of time: bossy, b____y, stay-at-home housewife.

    coelacanth

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 10576
    • eccentric orbit

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #194 on: November 05, 2016, 05:49:27 pm »
    Well here's an example of one feminist's view of how the world ought to be. Basically it reds like a fascist version of the stone age in which the human race will be doomed to extinction within a few decades.

    https://witchwind.wordpress.com/2014/10/07/utopia-what-would-a-womens-society-look-like/


    Awesome talent at work here.  Right up there with the best of Monty Python during their heyday.   :rotfl
    Arizona" A republic, if you can keep it."

                                                   Benjamin Franklin

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #195 on: November 05, 2016, 06:11:12 pm »
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #196 on: November 05, 2016, 06:12:03 pm »
    Awesome talent at work here.  Right up there with the best of Monty Python during their heyday.   :rotfl

    But... I don't thin she was joking...  :shocked
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    coelacanth

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 10576
    • eccentric orbit

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #197 on: November 05, 2016, 06:40:29 pm »
    Funny stuff there - whether it was intended that way or not.  I certainly wasn't kidding when I compared it to Monty Python.   

    Arizona" A republic, if you can keep it."

                                                   Benjamin Franklin

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #198 on: November 05, 2016, 06:49:43 pm »
    Funny stuff there - whether it was intended that way or not.  I certainly wasn't kidding when I compared it to Monty Python.   



     :facepalm Oh my goodness, thank you for sharing  :rotfl.

    The dots are now connected and I now understand the saying of "life imitates art".
    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    MTK20

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 8251
    • Mind of a philosopher, mouth of a sailor.

    • Offline
    Re: The Worst of SJW's.
    « Reply #199 on: November 05, 2016, 09:03:35 pm »


    Texas
    Do we forget that cops were primarily still using 6 Shot Revolvers well through the mid 80's? It wasn't until after 1986 that most departments then relented and went to autos.
    Capacity wasn't really an issue then... and honestly really it's not even an issue now.
    Ray Chapman, used to say that the 125-grain Magnum load’s almost magical stopping power was the only reason to load .357 instead of .38 Special +P ammunition into a fighting revolver chambered for the Magnum round. I agree. - Massad Ayoob

    Paradoxically it is those who strive for self-reliance, who remain vigilant and ready to help others.

    Help support WeTheArmed.com by visiting our sponsors.