Help support WeTheArmed.com by visiting our sponsors.

Author Topic: Which Caliber? .260 vs. 6.5x47  (Read 6561 times)

StevenTing

  • WTA Staff
  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 4651

  • Offline
Which Caliber? .260 vs. 6.5x47
« on: April 13, 2015, 01:44:44 pm »
I'm looking for another caliber once I am truly comfortable with my .308 and my ability to read wind.  Which one would you go for? Originally I was thinking the x47 but the more I read between the calibers, it seems like .260 would make more sense for me.  Lapua makes brass for both so that is not an issue.

Purpose of the caliber would be just target shooting competitions with ranges of 100 yards to 1000 yards.  There would even be the occasional 1200-1300 yard target.

I read this article and this is driving much of my preference right now.

http://demigodllc.com/articles/6.5-shootout-260-6.5x47-6.5-creedmoor/

Utah

WeTheArmed.com

  • Advertisement
  • ***

    coelacanth

    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 10576
    • eccentric orbit

    • Offline
    Re: Which Caliber? .260 vs. 6.5x47
    « Reply #1 on: April 13, 2015, 08:20:44 pm »
    Depends on what you're thinking of in terms of a rifle.   One of our members over at ArizonaGunOwners just completed a 6.5 Creedmore rifle and is extremely happy with it.  You can find the thread over there www.arizonagunowners.com in the "Rifles" section under the title, She's Done by car-ram-rod.   Might be a chance to take a look at a real world rifle by somebody you can chat with about it who speaks long range rifle shooting. 
    Arizona" A republic, if you can keep it."

                                                   Benjamin Franklin

    only1asterisk

    • Just some guy, you know?
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 2408

    • Offline
    Re: Which Caliber? .260 vs. 6.5x47
    « Reply #2 on: April 13, 2015, 08:38:11 pm »
    The .260 has enough of a capacity advantage to have a meaningful velocity advantage with heavier bullets.  For 1k and beyond the 6.5x47 falls short of the magic velocity window.  The 6.5 Creedmoor matches the .260 but the smaller 6.5x47 simply can't assuming both are restricted to sane pressures, even though it gets close.  The availability of Lapua brass weight heavily in my choices as well.  I haven't tried the Lapua .260 brass, but I have high hopes.  If you are going to shoot F-Open the 6.5x47 will not be much of a handicap.  If instead, you want to do something like PRS competition, then the difference may mean more.

    What action and magazine might you be using?  Timed competition mean magazines feeding and that raises possible issues with both cartridges in some circumstances. 

    Penguin

    • Contributor
    • ****
    • Posts: 1668

    • Offline
    Re: Which Caliber? .260 vs. 6.5x47
    « Reply #3 on: April 13, 2015, 08:46:51 pm »
    An interesting article to be sure. Thanks for sharing it. I found it very interesting since I am in the beginning stages of building up a long range rifle. Ballistics has never really been my thing. From reading about those three though I would lean toward the 260 Remington round. I have read a little about it but not a whole lot. The 6.5 Creedmore I have heard more about than read and from what I have heard it is good. The Lupua round I haven’t ever heard of. Sounds like any of the three would be a good choice. I suppose if it was up to me it would come down to barrel life, which one puts the least wear on a barrel?

    How do those compare to 308? I would assume with them being more modern that they are probably better at least for hitting targets. I don’t know how they would compare when it came to snipping bad guys. Best guess is out of that lot the 260 Remington would hit the hardest which is the other reason I would initially lean to that round out of the three.

    Another thing I think the 260 Reminton has going for it is, that it seems closer to 308 than the others so I would think that it would be easier to get it to feed from AICS mags. I don't know if you are going that route but, I rather like the AICS stock system.
    « Last Edit: April 13, 2015, 08:58:22 pm by Penguin »
    Doobie Doobie Doo...

    only1asterisk

    • Just some guy, you know?
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 2408

    • Offline
    Re: Which Caliber? .260 vs. 6.5x47
    « Reply #4 on: April 13, 2015, 10:14:51 pm »
    If you are considering doing practical rifle competition this might be of help:

    http://precisionrifleblog.com/2014/10/14/rifle-calibers-what-the-pros-use/

    Tons of information presented in a useful format.  Be advised, it is biased toward pros vs. joes.  It is possible to compete without $2000  scopes on $3000 rifles, especially at a local/regional level, but the guys at the top will take the any advantage no matter the cost. 


    GeorgeHill

    • Co-Founder
    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 22154
    • The Ogre
      • MadOgre.com

    • Offline
    Re: Which Caliber? .260 vs. 6.5x47
    « Reply #5 on: April 13, 2015, 10:18:59 pm »
    7mm WSM.

    But between the two in the OP... .260.
    South CarolinaCo-Founder of WeTheArmed.com
    The Ogre from MadOgre.com.

    Vires et Honestas
    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
    http://www.madogre.com/

    only1asterisk

    • Just some guy, you know?
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 2408

    • Offline
    Re: Which Caliber? .260 vs. 6.5x47
    « Reply #6 on: April 13, 2015, 11:21:21 pm »
    7mm WSM.

    But between the two in the OP... .260.

    I think it depends mostly on the kind of event.  30 rounds on a static square range at known distance is a different animal from 50 rounds from field positions under the clock.

    You could always get both with either switch barrel setup or two rifles.  I like the idea of a switch barrel to maintain the same stock, trigger and feel.

    StevenTing

    • WTA Staff
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 4651

    • Offline
    Re: Which Caliber? .260 vs. 6.5x47
    « Reply #7 on: April 13, 2015, 11:47:40 pm »
    I took the 6.5CM out of consideration because of barrel life.

    I have a 7WSM.  The only problem with it is finding brass.  It doesn't exist.  Supposedly Winchester will make some in 2015.  They didn't make any in 2014.  Everyone that I know that shoots 7WSM says that finding brass is the main downside to it.  I've got 50 brass.  Wish I had 300.

    I plan to use this next rifle in PRS type competitions as well as F-Class.  Right now the big thing is .260 and 6.5CM.  Some local guys are jumping on the x47.  One "advantage" of the x47 is that it uses a small primer, which supposedly means the brass will last longer because of fewer loose primer pockets.

    Wish I had the money to just do both.  In terms of cost, the .260 seems to be less expensive for brass.  Both will use the same components.  The .260 uses the .308 profile so I wouldn't need to buy a new headspace gauge.

    I'm still up in the air on this.
    Utah

    only1asterisk

    • Just some guy, you know?
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 2408

    • Offline
    Re: Which Caliber? .260 vs. 6.5x47
    « Reply #8 on: April 14, 2015, 12:02:36 am »
    I would think any difference in barrel life between the two would be on the side of the Creedmoor, if you could find one.  OTOH, if you are talking about 6mm Creedmoor, then barrel life is a valid concern.  It would be drastically shortened.  It has become very popular with the pros, but for them the reduced barrel life is acceptable for the smallest competitive advantage.   


    only1asterisk

    • Just some guy, you know?
    • Senior Contributor
    • *****
    • Posts: 2408

    • Offline
    Re: Which Caliber? .260 vs. 6.5x47
    « Reply #9 on: April 14, 2015, 12:13:01 am »
    Regarding 7mm WSM brass:

    .270 WSW brass can be used.  You will need to expand the case necks, but in this instance good full length resizing dies are enough.  It can be found.

    Help support WeTheArmed.com by visiting our sponsors.