Help support WeTheArmed.com by visiting our sponsors.

Author Topic: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).  (Read 976 times)

Grant

  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 4253

  • Online
What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« on: February 22, 2012, 02:02:12 PM »
  Well I'm always on the ass-end of any curve.   Behind,etc.   Almost always at least.    Sig P225's, K31's,etc. you name it, I go to buy it, the price jumps out of my reach 2-3 months before that.

   Well I might have my FAL fixed on the stringing (got to go out as soon as the rain quits and I'll try again), but regardless, I'm thinking of trading it off and setting myself up with a PSL.

  I LOVE my FAL, the power, the handling, but ever since I got my last batch of ammo (40 cents per round, shipped), I just kinda hoard it.  I shoot some, but I've increasingly begun using my AK's at ammo that's half the price of any new .308 I can acquire. 

  I been shooting my AK enough that's it's adequate out to 300, groups a little big and alot of drop at that distance but it's managable.  And past 400 yards I've been practicing with my M14.      Sorta eliminating the "sweet spot" that I used my FAL on, the 250-450 yard shooting.

  Well 54R ammo is sorta making me drool.  Right now it's cheaper than X39 ammunition, has longer reach.   I've no doubts in my mind that the days of super-cheap huge quantities of 54R is coming close.    Even so, Russian non-corrosive commercial will still be available, at roughly equal prices to .308 ammunition.

    I've got about 1,300 rounds of .308 stocked, and 25 magazines for my FAL...that's a decent investment I've already got into it, however if I could (roughly) trade/sell my FAL for a equal price for a PSL, I can get 1760 rounds of 54R for $340.    Extra PSL mags are hellacious prices right now, running about $35+ apiece. 

     Any thoughts?    The PSL wouldn't be too bad for out to 400 yards, and eventually I'd probably trim the barrel back to a slightly handier 20" or so.      I just dunno if it's worth switching over.       I'd save literally 25 cents for every round I shot.    I could probably only marginally lose money by selling the FAL.    The PSL mags would be a bigger loss, as I'd keep my FAL magazines (I bought them for $11 apiece, if I ever get another FAL, they'll cost more than that).
Montana


Help support WeTheArmed.com by visiting our sponsors.

nukehayes

  • Junior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 95
  • Sic Vis Pacem Parabellum
    • bubbleheadgunnut

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2012, 02:52:00 PM »
I would invest in a reloading press and some time to learn how to use it.  It will save you money and yield better groups than can be had by commercial cheap loads.  Personally, I would not ditch the FAL, even if you ended up with the PSL as well.
Ohio-Geoff the Combat Mechanic
www.bubbleheadgunnut.wordpress.com

mattitude

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 872
  • 100% disabled veteran
    • Ramblings of a Disabled Veteran

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2012, 04:12:52 PM »
If you are insistant on a 7.62x54R rifle then personally I would get a Vepr as it will be more accurate than a PSL and not cost much more.  Now if caliber dictated then I would get a Yugo M76 in 8mm.  The M76 is more accurate than the PSL and IMO the 8mm round is much easier to reload for and is excellent for mid-long range applications.  The mags are more expensive but the rifle itself is a tank.
Medically retired Air Force (17 years, 7 months & 25 days)

Khorne

  • Professor of History
  • WTA Staff
  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Elite Team Fighter
    • Minimum Wage Historian

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2012, 07:04:22 PM »
Both!  The PSL is good out to 600 yards with the PSO scope, but you can still use the iron sights while the scope is mounted, so its good for close range too. (providing you aint trying to do any room clearing.)  Yeah, the ammo is cheaper for a PSL, but that won't last and neither will the availability of the PSL.  They're only going to get rarer and more expensive.
Utah"English, base nave!  Doth thou speak it?!"
Check out my history blog at Minimum Wage Historian!
http://minimumwagehistorian.com/

Penguin

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 867

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2012, 07:20:10 PM »
I like my L1A1 better than my PSL for what it is worth. What kind of FAL do you have?
Doobie Doobie Doo...

Grant

  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 4253

  • Online
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2012, 10:49:33 PM »
 I've got an IMBEL kit-build with an 18" barrel.   It's been good for about 800 rounds, but recently had stringing problems.   A new recoil spring helped, but it's still more than I could make do with.    I gotta tinker a bit more and see if I can make a fix.

    I agree, if I kept the FAL and didn't go PSL, reloading would be an option.    The two big things was price of just bullets for the .308 (factory made FMJ's coming in at .22 cents apiece), being higher than surplus 54R at the moment.    The second was the impression that's been made by the steel core in the Russian surplus.    Only thing that's beat it in penetration was the .50 BMG and it tied with M855.     

I looked at the VEPR, but 5 round mags turned me off.   Supposedly US-made 10 rounders will be available soon, but I don't get my hopes up when it comes to US-made magazines for AK's.       The M76 was an option, especially if I get into reloading soon.  Still looking at it, but I never have got to see one in person.

  I guess my big thing is I am hoping to fix my FAL's stringing.  In which case it will quench the thirst for a PSL.     

 FAL aside, I got a spare Wasr10/63 and a pair of 9mm's that were going into an underfolder AK purchase....I think those might go into a PSL fund  :D
Montana

Coronach

  • WTA Staff
  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 2457
  • Armorer: Colt 1911, M16, Glock, M&P, Rem 700 & 870

  • Online
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #6 on: February 22, 2012, 11:12:50 PM »
My vote? Fix the FAL. There's a lot of institutional knowledge on the platform, and it is probably capable of better accuracy than a PSL, once you get it sorted. That, and I freely admit that I'm a fan of the Right Arm of the Free World.

Mike
OhioNot stressed, but I am a carrier.


Advertisement

ZeroTA

  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 2042

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #7 on: February 22, 2012, 11:17:24 PM »
Forget the money. Get the one you like best. Because if you're like me, you will anyway sooner or later.
Quote from:  Tokugawa
This is very simple - if it has to be TAKEN from someone else, to GIVE to you, it is not a right. To force another to work, so that you may reap the reward, is called slavery. All the other talk is just obfuscation.

GeorgeHill

  • Co-Founder
  • WTA Staff
  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 16696
  • The Ogre
    • MadOgre.com

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #8 on: February 22, 2012, 11:52:05 PM »
The FAL is indeed the better rifle, firing the better cartridge.
UtahCo-Founder of WeTheArmed.com
The Ogre from MadOgre.com, CrusaderWeaponry.com, ArmedAmericanRadio.org.

Vires et Honestas
http://www.madogre.com/    http://www.crusaderweaponry.com/

Atlas8193

  • Firearm Aficionado and Historian
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 557
  • Beware the peanut gallery...

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #9 on: February 23, 2012, 02:33:57 AM »
What's "wrong" with the/your FAL? "Right Arm of the Free World" was a title not earned through inadequacy or simply average performance.

Personally, I'd stick with the FAL.
Yes-ammo is more expensive. (barring surplus)
Yes-it's heavier.
Yes-the magazines (and I might be ignorant here) are expensive (then again, so are PSL mags to my knowledge)
HOWEVER, the FAL has a design that-if all else fails-you can actually HIT SOMEONE IN THE FACE with the ACTUAL RIFLE and not be too worried about permanently damaging the rifle.

Heavy-duty. Resilient. Reliable. Trust the FAL.
Although personally I am quite content with existing explosives, I feel we must not stand in the path of improvement.-Winston Churchill

coyotesfan97

  • WTA LEO
  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 2122
  • Life's Short Bite Hard!

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #10 on: February 23, 2012, 04:24:29 AM »
My vote? Fix the FAL. There's a lot of institutional knowledge on the platform, and it is probably capable of better accuracy than a PSL, once you get it sorted. That, and I freely admit that I'm a fan of the Right Arm of the Free World.

Mike

+1. I'd stick the FAL. My SA58 is becoming one of my favorite rifles
ArizonaThe bravest are surely those who have the clearest vision of what is before them, glory and danger alike, and yet notwithstanding, go out to meet it.  Thucydides 471BC

"Hey!  Let's be careful out there." Sgt Phil Esterhaus played by Michael Conrad

Penguin

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 867

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #11 on: February 23, 2012, 07:38:05 AM »
One thing you may consider also is the quality of ammo avalible. Especially if you are thinking about long range use. Finding match loads for the FAL is a lot easier than finding anything other than ball in 7.62x54R.
Doobie Doobie Doo...

Grant

  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 4253

  • Online
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #12 on: February 23, 2012, 02:10:16 PM »
 Just a quick update on my FAL problems.
http://falfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=322606

  I'm at a loss as to what I can do with it outside of sending it to a fal-smith and letting him tinker on it.   

Regardless:   I'm thinking that I'll use my "extra" guns to trade off on a PSL, get it AND fix my FAL....best of both worlds  :cool         Then if I really, really can't get the FAL fixed, sell it later.
Montana

Nightcrawler

  • WTA Secretary of Defense
  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 2673
  • That's what SHE said!

  • Offline
What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #13 on: February 23, 2012, 03:12:28 PM »
I was a FAL nut for years. Still love the rifles and have two of them.

But when FAL magazines got more expensive than .308 pmags I had Joe build me a Broadsword.

I would NOT trade a FAL for a PSL. The PSL is a capable rifle but at the end of the day it's a glorified Romanian AK.

If you want to get one, go for it. They're good rifles. But if you're going to sell the FAL trade it for a better rifle.

.308 ammo is pricey.  Reloading is the only way around it. Or deploy to Afghanistan and buy thousands of rounds while you're gone. ;)
UtahMOLON LABE

Explosive Ordnance Disposal
Part-Time Novelist


Advertisement

Grant

  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 4253

  • Online
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #14 on: February 23, 2012, 11:52:47 PM »
 First: I agree with what all are saying the PSL ain't exactly an upgrade, and I probably won't be selling it.  I got's a few things I'll try first, then, assuming they'll take it, I will try and get ahold of a FAL-smith to take a look at it.     

Second: I looked into reloading.   And seriously, honestly, I didn't see it as being that much cheaper. On bigger calibers yes, .223 and .308? not as much.   
Bullets, absolute cheapest: $195 per 1K
Powder: 7,000 grains per pound=40 grain average charge=175 rounds per can.  $20 per can, 11 cents per round    $110 worth of powder per 1K
  $40 for 1K primers
=$335 per1K, so only about 65% the price of factory ammo or saving $165 per 1,000 rounds.  That's some savings.     However that's also the bargain basement bulk FMJ's.   

 That said, Nightcrawler brought up something interesting, about "trading up" for a better rifle......What IS a better rifle?        I know Crusader is good, but for long-term, possible SHTF use, I don't want an AR design.        So, outside of a FAL......what is there?     From what I've seen, a FAL is about king when it comes to .30 caliber battle rifles for the 50-500 range.

I wouldn't necessarily say my M14 is "better", it's an equal, the same as a hatchet is an equal to a cutlass, each in their own arena.   
 
NC wrote:
Quote
The PSL is a capable rifle but at the end of the day it's a glorified Romanian AK
That's the reason I was interested  >:D   My Romy AK's have been surprisingly consistant when it comes to accuracy (more than I expected before I got into AK's), and was a virtually identical operating system.
Montana

hi-power

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 150

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #15 on: February 24, 2012, 12:11:53 AM »
the point of reloading isn't so much that you can load FMJ plinkers cheaper than factory, its that you can shoot premium bullets with shiny individually treated brass and a powder charge tuned for your rifle for the price of generic factory rounds. (more or less)

Atlas8193

  • Firearm Aficionado and Historian
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 557
  • Beware the peanut gallery...

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #16 on: February 24, 2012, 03:01:45 PM »
Wait, wait, wait...
I think I recall something about this rifle from a while back, and then you mentioned Loctite too.
Did ALL the rifles parts come from the same parts-kit? Because-my theory is that-if they didn't, then the Loctite is holding an improperly fitted rifle together...somehow.

Just a theory. Never heard of Loctiting rifles together... :shrug
Although personally I am quite content with existing explosives, I feel we must not stand in the path of improvement.-Winston Churchill

booksmart

  • Token Left Leaning Libertarian
  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 2191

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #17 on: February 24, 2012, 03:51:53 PM »
Epoxy... better living through chemistry...

Fun fact: has held my rear bumper on for the better part of 10 years now...
E. Pluribus Unum.

Avenger29

  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 2874
  • Compare your lives to mine and kill yourselves!

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #18 on: February 24, 2012, 04:47:21 PM »
I would not go to an inferior design. If anything, get a BETTER FAL than what you have (and if what Atlas says is correct regarding your rifle, the only place for loctite on a weapon is on the scope screws)

Your luck is you'd get a POS sample of a PSL and then you'd spend ages trying to work that out.
Quote from: RevDisk
Shooting hippies is not a moral activity that you can suspend, just because the world's all blown up and whatnot.  It's the moral and ethical duty of ALL Americans, religious or not, to do so on a regular basis.  Preferably with Sla

Grant

  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 4253

  • Online
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #19 on: February 24, 2012, 05:36:56 PM »
Wait, wait, wait...
I think I recall something about this rifle from a while back, and then you mentioned Loctite too.
Did ALL the rifles parts come from the same parts-kit? Because-my theory is that-if they didn't, then the Loctite is holding an improperly fitted rifle together...somehow.

Just a theory. Never heard of Loctiting rifles together... :shrug
It looks like an identical kit.  The bolt carrier has a differant SN on it, but that's it.   

  The spots that were problems, and fixed with loc-tite:
  The Pistol grip nut came loose.   I had that problem with an AR15 and AK as well.    The buttstock screw came loose, causing the buttstock to become wobbly.         
Montana

Grant

  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 4253

  • Online
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #20 on: February 24, 2012, 05:51:32 PM »
 P.S. Although you do bring up an interesting point:

I have terrible gun-karma.      Thus far the only thing to survive my terribleness is my Sig's , my 7MM mag and my AK's....everything else has fallen victim to it to some degree or another......(well not EVERYTHING, just seems like it  :-[)


P.P.S.  I am also considering getting a differant FAL.    However the odds of getting a good/bad one.....almost as bad as gambling on a PSL.     Lot of FAL's that don't/can't hold 3MOA.

*sigh*, why can't stuff just be simple.    Like my AK, take it out, point AK, pull trigger, bang.  Gong rings every time......no wacky scopes, no jams, no mysterious POI changes.
Montana

Avenger29

  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 2874
  • Compare your lives to mine and kill yourselves!

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #21 on: February 24, 2012, 07:17:00 PM »
Quote
Like my AK

You got a screwed-up one of those, too, with that Chinese AK you got!

Quote
However the odds of getting a good/bad one.

Just get a DSA one, and if it's not right, they fix it. STG-58s are running at the $1100 mark. And the FAL was meant to be a combat rifle, not a precision one. 4 MOA is the goal.



Quote from: RevDisk
Shooting hippies is not a moral activity that you can suspend, just because the world's all blown up and whatnot.  It's the moral and ethical duty of ALL Americans, religious or not, to do so on a regular basis.  Preferably with Sla

Grant

  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 4253

  • Online
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #22 on: February 24, 2012, 10:14:39 PM »
  Yeah, but the AK was my own danged fault for being a moron  ;)   I had the opportunity beforehand to see it's problem and I ignored it.     

  DSA is what I'd look at probably, however 4 MOA?   I got my AK's for mid/close-range.    My FAL/any .308 I was wanting for a first-hit (flatter trajectory than X39) out to 500 yards, yet good enough for up close and able to out-penetrate X39.     

I think first off, as one final thing on my own, I'm gonna try putting a differant scope on, then shooting a group with irons as well. to 100% eliminate that.

I think after that I'll see if I can get it in with a Fal-smith, repairing it could be cheaper, and if it can't be fixed, well it was a gamble.    As much as anything, I want to know WHY it all of a sudden went wacky.    If there's even a slight possibility of this happening again, or on a differant gun, I want to know.        Every other gun, I've found the problem, a loose screw, improper installation,etc.  But this gun, and my Mini-14, both all of a sudden went bonkers and I've been unable to find the problem.

Montana

Avenger29

  • Senior Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 2874
  • Compare your lives to mine and kill yourselves!

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #23 on: February 24, 2012, 11:19:21 PM »
Quote
however 4 MOA?

Yes, the FAL is an general infantry issue weapon, not a precision rifle. You are trying to make it something it is not and that's where you are likely going to have issues obtaining and maintaining accuracy. What skewers the expectation of accuracy in such a weapon is the AR-15/M-16's better than normal accuracy. The military standard for these rifles is 4MOA yet they routinely do better. Most other rifles of the type aren't going to do so well.

Want something more precise and still semi-auto? Larue OBR or something similar is going to be the easiest way to go about that, but you don't want an AR-10 platform apparently.






Quote from: RevDisk
Shooting hippies is not a moral activity that you can suspend, just because the world's all blown up and whatnot.  It's the moral and ethical duty of ALL Americans, religious or not, to do so on a regular basis.  Preferably with Sla

strangelittleman

  • Contributor
  • ****
  • Posts: 1190

  • Offline
Re: What do you think (Change from FAL to PSL).
« Reply #24 on: February 24, 2012, 11:25:32 PM »
Keep the FAL, like the old 1980's FN advertisments used to say, "It's the right arm of the free world".
Now get off the computer and go watch "The Wild Geese" and you'll feel all better!
TexasShhhhh!.....I'm hunting Hobbit.


Help support WeTheArmed.com by visiting our sponsors.